Sunday, June 2, 2019
Business Leadership :: essays research papers
Parallel to the evolution that has occured in the business world in decades past, is the evolution of views on participative leadership among managers. Participative leadership refers to the musical mode in which employers have come to treat their employees. This treatment has evolved from days of traditional, autocratic relationships in which employees were told exactly what tasks to do, without regard to their feelings or what intelligent input could be make to todays spectrum of treatment defined by two terms, human relations and human resources. Managers approaches today, now consider, not only the employees feelings, but the potential added benefits they capability be able to bring to the firm. The difference between human relations and human resources lies in the goals and expectations of the manager. With human relations, the managers primary concern is decrease employee resistance to authority with the satisfaction of the employees basic needs to feel accomplishment and b elonging in the society secondary is the performance and added benefits the employee may be able to contribute once morale is increased. On the other hand, managers who practices human resources look to empower their employees by encouraging them to take initiative and reach goals by their own capabilities and resources. With the sense of self-accomplishment gained by doing this, it is then that employee morale will be raised. Not only will the employees presence truly matter, but the companys productivity and mastery will also be greater. Managers stances today are headed in the direction of the human resources model, a beneficial move for the social welfare of company relations and success, but there are those who still practice human relations. Many companies demonstrate both models, proving employer/employee relationships in todays companies bide to range the spectrum. Two guiding companies of the human resource model are Lucent Technologies and Miller Brewing Company. The e mployees of these firms have been empowered with the ability to work in teams and achieve goals on their own. This flexibility has resulted in creativity and productivity unseen before. The effect greater employee morale, respect, and overall company success. With the human relations model, such success is uncomparable. Understandably, there are those who still advocate it though. Those people might look at such successful companies as Mary Kay Cosmetics. The consultants of this firm enjoy the rise and widespread support, making job loyalty and morale very high. However, in reality, employees of Mary Kay dont have the opportunity or flexibility to research their ideas in terms of corporate and influential decisions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.